Connect with us


The Shark FlexStyle is greater than the Dyson Airwrap



The Shark FlexStyle is greater than the Dyson Airwrap

Mashable Different

Mashable Different is a badge of honor, reserved for completely the finest stuff you would also see, use, or carry out. If or not it’s Different, or not it’s worth your time.

Revlon One-Step, your reign is over. There is a brand new Dyson Airwrap dupe on town, and or not it’s the finest we now occupy ever seen — the Shark FlexStyle.

You occupy doubtless seen the FlexStyle for your For You page, and observed that unlike pretty noteworthy each diversified dupe available, it in truth looks as if the Airwrap. It has a wand homely and numerous alternative interchangeable styling heads, including Coanda tech-powered curling barrels — , those that magically wrap your hair spherical the barrel with out a hitch.

The resemblances don’t appear to be valid in its appearance. I’ve throughly examined each merchandise, and at the cease of the day, the efficiency is virtually indistinguishable. If anything else, the Shark offers just a few new aspects that sort me attain for it more.

Factoring in its $270 tag point, the Shark goes previous being a gold-normal dupe. Or not it’s an exquisite reproduction for only half of the worth and it also outperforms the novel.

What is available in the sphere

The accumulate loves jog down of anything else neatly-liked, so I acquire you would even be potentially itching to peek me abominate on the Airwrap. But sooner than we acquire into any essential comparisons, let’s streak over what you would even be in truth getting with the Shark.

Of course, it’s some distance dependent on what configuration you score. Right here’s what’s on hand:

  • The most price-efficient two alternatives location you abet $269.ninety 9 will occupy to you store at Amazon and Easiest Aquire. The first option entails two 1.25-wander curling attachments, the oval brush, the hump brush, and the styling concentrator. For people with straight or a bit wavy hair, here’s a elephantine opt. While you happen to might perchance occupy wavier or curlier hair, the 2nd option entails all of the above, however swaps the hump brush for a diffuser. (These alternatives are also each on hand on Shark’s web sites, however for $300, so we recommend going for a Third-event retailer.)

  • On Shark’s web sites finest, you would also use $279.ninety 9 to customize your abilities and decide any three attachments out of the six on hand alternatives (the two curling barrels depend as one attachment).

all of the shark attachments plus the wand

I got the wavy hair machine, plus the hump brush to take a look at up on.
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

Shark despatched me the wavy hair machine to take a look at, however also incorporated the hump brush on the aspect. The finest attachment I did not receive was once the newly-released extensive-teeth comb, however I contain not occupy the hair texture to properly test it anyway. Bought individually, each of the particular individual attachments will bustle you $29.95.

Shark also sends along a minute booklet of tricks on how to make use of every attachment, with ideas for the warmth and air settings.

No longer just like the Airwrap, you would also additionally use the FlexStyle attachment-free, due to homely’s skill to swivel and in most cases replicate the abilities of a standard hair dryer. I packed the homely by itself for a marriage I was once in, and it was once design less tubby in my earn than any jog hair dryer has ever been.

The price of the Shark FlexStyle versus the Dyson Airwrap

Now that the comparisons to the Dyson occupy begun in earnest, let’s acquire the whole design down to what in truth matters — the worth.

As a refresher, the Airwrap will bustle you $600 for six attachments, including two diversified sized curling barrels, a smoothing dryer attachment, two smoothing brushes, and a spherical volumizing brush. Any extra attachments will tag you $40 each, however Dyson does occupy more alternatives total.

Breaking it down completely by the desire of attachments, that is roughly $100 per attachment, and I will’t articulate each one justifies its field (having a seek at you, company smoothing brush and relaxed smoothing brush).

The FlexStyle, on the diversified hand, comes with four attachments, however as I talked about above, can characteristic as a dryer sans attachment. Therefore, that you should occupy 5 styling alternatives for $270, which breaks the whole design down to about $54 per attachment. Even with out the built-in drying, you would even be aloof paying about $67.50 per attachment, placing you design below the Dyson.

all of the shark flexstyle attachments next to the dyson airwrap attachments

Minus just a few differences, the attachments offered are virtually a one-to-one.
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

The discrepancy in tag would not translate to a discrepancy in quality, either. The attachments conducted practically identically, the whole design down to the curling attachment the utilization of Coanda air tech to score your hair for you. Both stylers occupy three warmth settings, three fan speeds, and a groovy shot button or switch.

The finest diversified edge the Dyson has is its like carrying case, which I carry out opt for storage over the sphere the Shark is available in. I valid don’t opt it for $330 more.

shark flexstyle field next to dismal blue dyson airwrap case

The Dyson case feels more polished, however not $330 more polished.
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

Attachments breakdown

When I was once in the initiate despatched my pattern of the FlexStyle, I examined it for just a few weeks and feeble each attachment no lower than once, if not just a few cases.

I articulate in the initiate because after I was once accomplished attempting out and in the center of of penning this evaluation, Shark educated me that they wished to send me a more moderen pattern with an updated ALCI jog that was once supposed to lengthen the lifespan and sturdiness of the FlexStyle. The one I had been despatched was once a pre-begin version despatched to a restricted desire of customers, and a Shark spokesperson reassured me that someone with the “extinct” model was once despatched the updated version.

I articulate this for the sake of transparency, not because I observed a difference the least bit in the FlexStyle’s efficiency. I retested each attachment with the brand new pattern, all any other time no lower than once if not multiple cases for the related timespan. No longer one among the attachments or the homely as a standalone dryer conducted in any other case, and all of the attachments clicked in to the homely and stayed locked in with out a hitch.

With all of that acknowledged, here is how I found out the abilities of the utilization of every attachment that was once despatched to me. As I illustrious earlier on this evaluation, I failed to receive the brand new extensive-teeth comb supposed for coily and curly hair, nor might perchance well I in truth occupy accurately examined it.

Auto-wrap curlers

When I reviewed the most contemporary version of the Dyson Airwrap, I went on and on about how grateful I was once to take a look at the curling attachment that failed to require switching barrels and was once pretty dramatic about how detrimental that might perchance well’ve been to my minimal hair-styling endurance.

Then, the FlexStyle arrived and I saw that Shark’s curlers are exactly like of the Airwrap’s first abilities, which require you to replace barrels to replace instructions of the curls. And that? That is a form of moments where I acquire to teach their non-public praises my maturity and admit that I was once faulty. It was once in truth not that massive of a deal to replace out the curling wands mid-styling.

Assemble not acquire me faulty, it supposed that I pretty noteworthy stuck to the watch of curls going one direction — some distance from my face — on either aspect of my head. On the replacement hand, what I observed with these curlers, and with hot air styled curls in normal, is that on my hair, they watch the finest and frustrate me the least after I lean in to a more very loosely curled blown-out watch. The more structured curl watch that I will with out issues manufacture with a curling wand merely would not closing when the utilization of a hot air styler. (Allegedly, there are techniques to acquire hot air styled curls to closing, however they’ve by no approach worked for me, and are frankly some distance too time ingesting to be worth it.)

lady in green robe with curled hair

The curls regarded decent incandescent after styling.
Credit score: Bethany Allard

lady with a bit curled hair

But embracing more blown-out voluminous curls made me noteworthy happier with the implications.
Credit score: Bethany Allard

All this to articulate, I contain not mediate switch the direction of the curls makes that massive a difference whereas you would even be going for the free curl watch with the plan to add valid a bit dimension and quantity. Plus, my free curl design took less time and let me style on dry hair, which made me design more at risk of attain for these attachments.

OK, closing thing on the curlers after which we can circulation on — they accumulate not occupy a longer barrel version supposed for longer hair, like those I examined with the Airwrap. Eager on the ends of my hair are closer to the backside of my abet than my shoulders, I anticipated it will also pose a suppose, however once all any other time, Shark proved me faulty. Sure, the hair wrapped spherical itself more, however I in truth did not obtain myself having to alter allotment sizes. The wand was once valid at winning at grabbing my hair, and the style lasted for the related amount of time.

Styling concentrator

Whereas I will’t articulate the utilization of the concentrator gave a vastly difference abilities from the sans-attachment dry, it did acquire a form of moisture out of my hair in below quarter-hour. I aloof had some frizz, however I tough dried my hair, so as that was once to be anticipated. Whereas or not it’s potentially the most redundant attachment since you do not want it to tough dry your hair, I might perchance well see a more directed air hurry having a time and build, particularly will occupy to you pair it with a brush. It does acquire parts for being immense shrimp and straightforward to retailer or pack.

shark flexstyle twisted with concentrator attachment

It lowkey looks as if a vacuum attachment, however the styling concentrator gets the job accomplished.
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

Oval brush

My reliable tier rating of hot air oval brushes I’ve tried is as follows: the Revlon One-Step, the 2nd abilities Airwrap, after which the Shark FlexStyle. Or not it’s not that the FlexStyler’s brush was once negative — I in truth in truth loved the design my hair came out, and I’m in most cases not an mountainous fan of my hair with out some defined waves or curls in it. I also loved that the barrel was once greater than that of the Airwrap, as it felt like I might perchance well acquire more quantity and prance in my hair.

lady with long free curl styled hair

My favourite fragment of my job is taking photos of myself (however seriously, my hair looks good).
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

What got me was once the design it felt the utilization of this attachment with the swivel fragment of the homely. Working with a spherical brush to style your hair requires little bit of stress, and I might perchance well see and feel the homely on the Shark transferring ever so a bit. It was once by no approach ample to trigger ache, on the replacement hand it was once noticeable. Easy, I in truth can’t complain that noteworthy. Working in sections from 80 percent dry hair, it finest took me about 25 minutes to fully style my hair, and I cherished the implications.

Gallop brush

This was once my non-public least favourite attachment, mostly because all any other time, not so noteworthy partial to my hair straight. While you happen to shall be not in truth shopping for a ton of quantity, and opt gentle swish hair better than the relaxation, the hump brush will be your finest pal.

It was once immense easy to make use of, and did not yank or tug, which particularly impressed me because I in truth occupy forever knotty hair. I began from about 80 percent dry hair, though some sections had been more damp than others, and was once in a position to acquire perfectly straight and dry hair in 10 minutes.

Curl defining diffuser

My wavy hair and I had been stoked to be despatched a diffuser, and the Shark one did a elephantine job.

Veritably, I could use a diffuser to give an total dry to my hair, then pixie diffuse — a approach where you let minute sections of hair fall into the bowl of the diffuser, scrunch upward, and preserve it into build for 15 to 30 seconds.

Although Dyson does offer a comb attachment for curly hair, there’s no diffuser for the Airwrap. This gave the Shark an mountainous edge, and was once one among the greatest factors in figuring out that it outperformed the product it was once made to dupe.

I’m not immense valid, and I in most cases finest streak for no subject percent dry hides that reality that I washed my hair valid sooner than I went out in public in the center of the afternoon. Although my course of can lean on the haphazard aspect, I cherished how noteworthy alter this diffuser gave me in styling my hair. I might perchance well alter the prongs to be long (Shark recommends this for roots/longer hair) or quick (for shorter hair or ends). The long prongs sort grabbing sections and of course retaining it for pixie diffusing so easy.

shark flexstyle with diffuser and a blue blow dryer with a dim diffuser

The Shark FlexStyle versus my normal diffusing machine.
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

Having that alter not finest made the course of of styling more satisfying, however I mediate it in truth gave me greater results. For a fun, very un-scientific experiment, on one test I dried half of my hair with the FlexStyle and the diversified half of with my normal blow dryer and diffuser combo (a BabylissPro Nano Titanium and its matching diffuser). When I feeble the Shark, I had less anxiety retaining sections in the bowl of the diffuser, which led to more defined waves. I observed the longer prongs when entering into my root to dry with some take. Most of all, I loved I might perchance well carry out the total dry in dryer mode after which switch to wand mode for pixie diffusing.

shark flexstyle in wand mode next to a blue babylisspro hair dryer

No wand mode for the BabylissPro.
Credit score: Bethany Allard

The timing was once about the related, and all any other time the implications weren’t that diversified, on the replacement hand it made me, a devout air dryee, in truth are attempting to drag out a blow dryer more. Although Dyson does offer a comb attachment for curly hair, there’s no diffuser for the Airwrap. This gave the Shark an mountainous edge, and was once one among the greatest factors in figuring out that it outperformed the product it was once made to dupe.

lady with wavy long hair

Although I aloof foremost to circulation in with a hair oil to aloof the frizz, the left aspect (styled by the FlexStyle) had noticeably more defined waves than the incandescent (styled by my customary dryer).
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

More reward for the total compose

The Shark’s homely is a bit bigger than the Dyson’s, however of course each are form of surprisingly vast whereas you first pull them out of the sphere. Eager on you would also twist the Shark, the additional wander and a half of or so made sense.

Weight-wise, the Dyson is ever so a bit lighter, with finest 24 oz on Shark’s 24.64 oz. I might perchance well tell a difference after I held each wands in either hand, however after I was once styling, I did not mediate twice about it.

One smaller replace that Shark made that I particularly preferred was once knocking down the barrel of the homely where the energy switch, air, and temperature buttons had been positioned. It made it immense easy to hit the cool shot button with out having a seek, or replace the air tempo after I was once diffusing my hair.

shark flex style wand

The flat aspect of the wand makes it easy to uncover the buttons with out having a seek.
Credit score: Bethany Allard / Mashable

Is the Shark FlexStyle worth it?

Very just like the Airwrap, the FlexStyle is just not an absolute a must occupy hair styling instrument, particularly will occupy to you already accumulate a blow dryer and a few hot instruments.

On the replacement hand, will occupy to you would even be having a seek to replace to hot air styling to abet your hair out for frequent styling, the FlexStyle is 100% worth it. Admittedly, I am any individual who would noteworthy rather accumulate more effort into their makeup than hair, however I found out myself attempting to style my hair more in most cases with the FlexStyle.

Although it has some minor flaws, at $270, those are noteworthy more uncomplicated to observe previous than those of the Airwrap. Between the FlexStyle and the Airwrap, or not it’s laborious for me to mediate a the explanation why you would opt for the latter unless you would even be into vast purchases for the sake of vast purchases, or will occupy to you would even be particularly true to Dyson. But if neither of those apply to you, then there’s a greater vacuum company making hair tech to throw an awfully much smaller amount of you money unhurried.

You might perchance well know Shark for their vacuums and not their hair merchandise, however clearly it’s some distance rarely very unlikely for a tag to efficiently sort that pivot. If any other tag is going to forge down Dyson’s course, we are going to apply and trace what they’re doing — particularly in the event that they’re offering this form of transparent Airwrap replacement.

I examined the FlexStyle for numerous weeks, so I might perchance well use each attachment no lower than once. After those numerous weeks, Shark requested to send me a brand new pattern, because the test pattern that they had despatched me sooner than begin did not near with an improved ALCI jog that was once supposed to lengthen the lifespan and sturdiness of the FlexStyle.

I retested each attachment on the more moderen pattern, and observed no difference in day-to-day efficiency. I also by no approach skilled any factors with the novel pattern, and a Shark spokesperson reassured me that the restricted desire of customers that did receive the older version of the product had their devices changed.

Finally, a quick profile of my hair, which persevered your whole attempting out: My hair is long, supreme, with waves that take a seat between a 2A and 2B pattern. Or not it’s inclined to dryness at the ends, and in most cases can preserve curled kinds for just a few day and straight kinds for one to two days, equipped that no water or humidity touches my hair.

  • Styling time: It is not crucial if or not it’s a groovy knowing, if curling your hair with hot air in preference to hot wands takes very much longer, we are going to wager it acquired’t take long sooner than you opt for the less healthy and more convenient design. Reckoning on the attachment, the FlexStyle took wherever from 10 to forty five minutes to style hair, retaining it fixed with diversified hot air stylers, timing-wise.

  • Heat settings: Every person’s hair is diversified, meaning they’ll withstand diversified temperatures. With that acknowledged, no one will occupy to aloof be blasting their hair with 400 diploma plus temps on the reg, unless they ask to take on some destroy. The FlexStyle measures and regulates temperature 1,000 cases per 2nd to sort sure the air temp is fixed and not overly negative to the hair. Handiest at its freshest surroundings did it initiate to feel in truth hot, however even then, not virtually as hot as any normal curling wand or straightener. The heart warmth surroundings was once in most cases better than ample to lock in kinds.

  • Range of attachments: A versatile hair instrument is finest beautiful noteworthy as good as its attachments. Although the Coanda air curling barrels are what draw many to this make of hot air styler, Shark in truth has a solid vary of styling instruments, from the conventional spherical brush, concentrated dryer, the diffuser, and the hump brush. It might perchance perchance well even be nice to peek some wider and narrower curling attachments in due course, however for their first iteration, one size is just not a negative build to initiate.

  • Storage: An all-in-one hair instrument loses out on its ease component if it turns precise into a anxiety to retailer. Like the Dyson Airwrap, the Flex Styler is sure to take in amount of plight. No longer just like the Airwrap, it would not near with a dedicated carrying case, which makes your whole storage course of loads less organized.

Mashable Image

Bethany Allard is a having a seek reporter at Mashable covering beauty tech, dating, and sex and relationships. She graduated from Novel York College with a B.A. in Journalism and English Literature. You might perchance also apply her on Twitter @betallard and attain her by electronic mail at [email protected]

Sahil Sachdeva is the CEO of Level Up Holdings, a Personal Branding agency. He creates elite personal brands through social media growth and top tier press features.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Australia and US Unveil Cutting-Edge Undersea Drones: Ghost Shark and Manta Ray




Ghost Shark and Manta Ray might sound like characters from a future Marvel movie, but they represent a significant leap forward in Pacific naval defenses. These prototype uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs) were recently introduced by Australia and the United States, and they could revolutionize undersea warfare by enhancing power while minimizing the risks to human life.

Developed by Australia, Ghost Shark, and crafted by Northrop Grumman in the US, Manta Ray, significant advancements in military technology. The Ghost Shark prototype, “Alpha,” was co-developed by the Defence Science and Technology Group, Navy, and Anduril Australia. It offers stealthy, long-range autonomous capabilities for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and strike missions. According to the Australian Defense Ministry, the first production models are expected by the end of next year, though specific details remain classified.

In the United States, the Boeing-built Orca UUV and Northrop Grumman’s Manta Ray prototype showcase modular designs for varied payloads and efficient deployment. Aerial drones have become commonplace in warfare, and their maritime counterparts are set to follow. Drones have been extensively used by the US in conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan since the 1990s and have become key military hardware in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Kyiv’s naval surface drones have inflicted significant damage on Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.

However, controlling drones underwater presents unique challenges. Unlike aerial and surface drones that use satellites and radio waves, underwater drones face communication barriers due to water’s properties. A 2023 study published in the Swiss journal *Sensors* highlights that underwater communications require more energy and suffer significant data loss due to variables like water temperature, salinity, and depth. Makers of the new generation of military UUVs have not disclosed how they will overcome these challenges.

When Australia unveiled Ghost Shark, it called the prototypes “the most advanced undersea autonomous vehicles in the world.” These UUVs are designed to provide the Navy with stealthy, long-range capabilities for persistent intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), and strike. This innovation marks a significant milestone in undersea defense technology.

Australian officials and those from manufacturer Anduril Australia have not shared specific details on Ghost Shark due to classification. However, they emphasized the speed of development from concept to prototype within two years. “Being ahead of schedule, on budget, it’s pretty unheard of,” said Shane Arnott, Anduril’s senior vice president for engineering. Australia’s chief defense scientist, Tanya Monro, stated that delivering the first Ghost Shark prototype ahead of schedule sets a new standard for rapid capability development.

Emma Salisbury, a fellow at the British think tank Council on Geostrategy, noted that Ghost Shark seems similar to the Orca extra-large UUV being developed in the US. Ukraine has used sea drones effectively against Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, with each drone carrying at least 250kg (500lb) of explosives. Salisbury suggested that these UUVs are likely intended for similar missions, focusing on intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and anti-submarine capabilities.

The US Navy describes the Boeing-built Orca UUV as a cutting-edge, autonomous, unmanned diesel-electric submarine with a modular payload section for various missions. The modular design allows the Orca to carry different weapons or specialized equipment for reconnaissance or intelligence gathering. The Pentagon plans to acquire five more UUVs, but no specific timetable has been provided. The Orca has been in development for over a decade, highlighting the contrast with the rapid progress of Australia’s Ghost Shark.

Chris Brose, Anduril’s chief strategy officer, stated that the company and Australia are proving that these capabilities can be developed much faster, cheaper, and more intelligently. Anduril Australia indicated that Ghost Shark, developed entirely domestically, would be available for export after joining the Australian naval fleet.

Meanwhile, the US continues to innovate with Northrop Grumman’s Manta Ray, which was tested off Southern California in February and March. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) praised Manta Ray’s modularity, which allows payloads to be switched out depending on the mission. The Manta Ray can be broken down to fit into five standard shipping containers, transported to the deployment site, and reassembled in the field. This method saves internal energy for the mission instead of using it to reach the deployment site.

DARPA program manager Kyle Woerner highlighted the innovation in Manta Ray’s design, which began in 2020. Despite slower development compared to Ghost Shark, DARPA is working with the US Navy on the next steps for testing and transitioning the technology. China, identified by the US military as a primary threat in the Pacific, is also advancing in UUV development. Submarine expert H I Sutton suggests that Beijing has at least six extra-large UUVs in development based on open-source intelligence.

Besides Australia, the US, and China, other countries developing UUVs include Canada, France, India, Iran, Israel, North Korea, Norway, Russia, South Korea, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. The rapid evolution of UUV technology underscores the strategic importance of undersea defenses in modern military operations. Ghost Shark and Manta Ray exemplify the cutting-edge advancements leading this transformative shift in naval warfare.

Continue Reading


Wall Street’s Renewed Fascination with Roblox: Uncovering Three Driving Forces



gettyimages-1771143243-restricted (1)

In recent months, Wall Street has witnessed a resurgence of interest in the virtual gaming platform, Roblox. While this may come as a surprise to some, there are several compelling reasons behind this renewed enthusiasm among investors.

Firstly, Roblox has demonstrated impressive growth potential. With its unique combination of gaming, social interaction, and user-generated content, the platform has captured the imaginations of millions of users worldwide. This exponential growth trajectory has not gone unnoticed by Wall Street, with analysts and investors alike eager to capitalize on Roblox’s promising future.

Secondly, Roblox’s innovative business model has garnered attention for its monetization strategies. Unlike traditional video game publishers that rely on upfront sales or subscription fees, Roblox operates on a freemium model, allowing users to play for free while offering optional in-game purchases. This approach has proven to be highly lucrative, with Roblox reporting robust revenue streams from virtual items, in-game currency, and developer payouts. Wall Street recognizes the potential of this business model to generate sustained revenue growth and profitability over the long term.

gettyimages-2078959000 (1)

Lindsey Nicholson/UCG/Getty Images/File

Lastly, Roblox’s strategic partnerships and expansion efforts have bolstered investor confidence. The platform has forged collaborations with major brands, entertainment companies, and celebrities to create exclusive virtual experiences, further enhancing its appeal to users and investors alike. Additionally, Roblox has been actively expanding its presence in international markets, tapping into new audiences and revenue streams. These strategic initiatives signal Roblox’s commitment to continued growth and innovation, making it an attractive investment opportunity for Wall Street.

In conclusion, Wall Street’s renewed interest in Roblox can be attributed to its impressive growth potential, innovative business model, and strategic expansion efforts. As the platform continues to evolve and capture the hearts of users worldwide, investors are increasingly bullish on Roblox’s prospects for long-term success.

Continue Reading


Rising Tensions in Silicon Valley as Controversy Brews Over Start-Up Stock Sales




In March, the entrepreneurial vision of Sohail Prasad materialized into the Destiny Tech100 fund, a venture poised to capitalize on the allure of technology titans like Stripe, SpaceX, and OpenAI. This fund, designed to grant broader access to privately held companies’ shares, ignited hope among investors eager to claim a stake in Silicon Valley’s hottest prospects.

Yet, Destiny’s debut was swiftly shadowed by controversy. Denials from tech luminaries Stripe and Plaid regarding Destiny’s ownership of their shares rocked the nascent fund. Concurrently, detractors lambasted Destiny as “too good to be true,” while Robinhood, the popular stock trading app, hastily removed the fund from its offerings, citing an erroneous inclusion.


Sarah Blesener for The New York Times

Amidst the tumult, Prasad remained resolute, interpreting the uproar as emblematic of a cultural shift, with Destiny positioned as a vanguard of change.

These developments underscore a mounting tension surrounding the enigmatic domain of private company stocks, a realm witnessing an unprecedented surge in activity. Secondary market transactions, forecasted to soar to a staggering $64 billion this year—a 40% surge from the previous year—signal a profound evolution in investment dynamics.

As investor appetite swells, a proliferation of online platforms emerges, connecting sellers with eager buyers. Destiny, among the few options accessible to retail investors, stands as a beacon amid a landscape predominantly accessible to accredited investors.

Yet, amidst this fervor, challenges emerge. Many entrenched start-ups, accustomed to tightly controlled ownership structures, now confront mounting pressure as a broader spectrum of investors clamor for shares. Compliance with intricate securities laws becomes increasingly convoluted, raising multifaceted concerns for all stakeholders involved.

In this ever-evolving panorama, a poignant question resonates: should the riches and risks of Silicon Valley’s entrepreneurial endeavors be democratized? As tensions escalate and uncertainty looms, the future of private company stock trading hangs in a precarious balance, poised at the intersection of aspiration and apprehension.

Continue Reading


Big Tech’s Showdown: The Climactic Google Trial Marks the Strongest U.S. Challenge to Tech Power



02google-endgame-wfgp-superJumbo (1)

In the heart of Silicon Valley, a legal showdown is underway that could reshape the landscape of the tech industry. The trial, often dubbed as the strongest challenge to Big Tech’s power in the United States, revolves around none other than Google, the search engine giant that has become synonymous with internet navigation.

At its core, the trial questions whether Google, with its unparalleled dominance in the search engine market, has engaged in anti-competitive practices that stifle innovation and harm consumers. The outcome of this trial could have far-reaching implications not only for Google but for the entire tech ecosystem.

For years, critics have raised concerns about Google’s business practices, particularly its control over online advertising and search results. Allegations range from favoring its services in search results to striking deals that effectively block out competitors. The trial represents a culmination of these concerns, bringing them to the forefront of public and regulatory scrutiny.

One of the key arguments put forth by the prosecution is that Google’s dominance in search gives it an unfair advantage in other markets, such as online advertising, where it holds a commanding position. By allegedly manipulating search results to promote its products and services, Google is accused of stifling competition and limiting consumer choice.

On the other hand, Google contends that its search engine algorithms prioritize user experience and relevance, rather than promoting its interests. The company argues that competition in the digital sphere is fierce and that its success is a result of delivering what users want.

Regardless of the outcome, the Google trial marks a significant moment in the broader conversation about Big Tech regulation. It comes at a time when governments around the world are increasingly scrutinizing the power wielded by tech giants and exploring ways to curb their influence.

Beyond Google, the outcome of this trial could set a precedent for future antitrust actions against other tech giants like Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, which have also faced scrutiny over their market dominance.

As the trial unfolds, all eyes are on the courtroom, where the fate of Big Tech’s power hangs in the balance. Whatever the verdict, one thing is certain: the Google trial will leave a lasting impact on the future of the tech industry and the regulation of its most powerful players.

Continue Reading


The Future of Entrepreneurship: Insights from Royan Nidea’s Vision




Royan Nidea

With a rapidly evolving technological landscape and changing consumer preferences, the online business holds immense potential to unleash. Businesses around the globe are constantly trying to find their competitive advantage in order to stay relevant and remain ahead of the curve. The dynamics of doing business in today’s digital era are constantly changing, which is why innovation and adaptability are crucial for sustained growth. However, there are so many avenues to pursue in online business that entrepreneurs often find themselves overwhelmed and getting struck. In situations like these, Royan Nidea, a seasoned entrepreneur in online space and the founder of Setters Philippines, highlights the importance of attention management. In a marketplace inundated with information and distractions, the ability to focus on one’s core objectives becomes paramount. While navigating the noise may pose challenges, those who can prioritise and focus on their “one thing” stand tall for success.

Recognising the Potential of Online Business

From being an 18-year-old college dropout to owning a corporation at 30 years old, Royan’s journey into the online space began while he was working with a coaching consulting firm, where he discovered the untapped power of LinkedIn for acquiring clients. This pivotal moment planted the seed of an idea to create a platform that could seamlessly connect highly trained and experienced virtual assistants with businesses looking for effective scaling solutions. 

Setters Philippines was born with a vision of creating one million online jobs. Today, with the power of virtual assistants, Setters Philippines not only empowers Filipinos but also enables entrepreneurs worldwide to scale their businesses efficiently. Not just that, Setters Philippines supports business owners in taking better care of themselves, allowing them to focus on core business activities, spend quality time with loved ones and provide greater customer service. And how? by utilising virtual assistants to assist them in reclaiming their time. 

By recognizing the potential of emerging technologies and leveraging them in their best capacity to address market needs, entrepreneurs can carve out their paths to success in the digital landscape.

Exploring Unconventional Paths

Royan chose a partnership model rather than an employment one for Setters Philippines, allowing anyone to sign up as a virtual assistant without having to pay anything upfront. Royan’s business views them as partners and provides them with a dynamic network, training in a variety of approaches, including LinkedIn and email lead generation, and most crucially, direct clientele. His team is reaching out to more than 10,000 decision makers a day to match them with premium virtual assistants.

With this novel strategy, partners only split revenue when they’ve acquired clients and begun to make money, which promotes organic growth. Actually, 75% of the partners’ revenue is retained by them. 

Thinking beyond traditional ways and trying unconventional approaches to establish connections with partners and consumers can work wonders, especially in the digital realm. Entrepreneurs can create platforms that connect buyers and sellers, offer services, or facilitate collaboration. Ultimately it all boils down to –  how your business can become a hub for value exchange.

The Future of Online Business and Entrepreneurship

Reflecting on his journey, Nidea recalls his early foray into online work in 2017. At the time, the full potential of the online entrepreneurship space was yet to be realised. However, a conversation with his wife in 2019 sparked a realisation – a prediction that the majority of the workforce would eventually transition to remote work. Little did he know that a few months later, a global pandemic would accelerate this shift and to everyone’s surprise people adopted the idea of working from home and that too with ease.

Today, as businesses increasingly embrace remote work models, entrepreneurs have unprecedented opportunities to tap into a diverse talent pool and operate on a global scale. Moreover, the pandemic has underscored the importance of building and engaging with online communities. Entrepreneurs can leverage these communities for networking, knowledge sharing, and customer engagement. By collaborating with like-minded individuals and learning from their experiences entrepreneurs can gain valuable insights. 

Through his entrepreneurial endeavours, Royan Nidea has not only transformed his career but has also created pathways for others to achieve financial independence and success in the online marketplace. His journey into online business is of sheer foresightedness, adaptability and a commitment to creating positive change in the ever-evolving landscape of online business. 

Looking Ahead

In conclusion, Royan Nidea believes that there is immense potential in the future of online business and entrepreneurship. From the rise of remote work to the growing importance of e-commerce and digital marketing, Royan’s vision encompasses the key trends shaping the future of online business. His insights can provide us with a roadmap to seize opportunities and progress towards growth. Subsequently, only 66% of the global population has access to the internet currently, which makes it evident that we are far from reaching the finish line. As internet connectivity continues to expand, so do the opportunities for aspiring entrepreneurs to make their mark in the digital landscape. Hence, by staying abreast of emerging trends and leveraging innovative strategies, entrepreneurs can position themselves for success in the digital economy.

Continue Reading


Samsung’s Profits Skyrocket Amid AI Boom




Samsung Electronics is anticipating a robust demand surge for artificial intelligence (AI), which is poised to tighten the supply of high-end chips, contributing to a solid rebound in the global memory chip market. This optimistic outlook from the world’s leading memory chip maker has driven its shares up by 1.8% following a remarkable more than 10-fold increase in first-quarter operating profit.

Despite experiencing a slight decline in its shares this year, Samsung is actively working to bolster its position in supplying top-tier chips, particularly high bandwidth memory (HBM) crucial for AI leader Nvidia. The company plans to significantly ramp up HBM chip production in 2024, with a focus on the latest 8-layer HBM3E chips, while also gearing up for the production of 12-layer versions.

Analysts are acknowledging Samsung’s ambitious targets, noting the potential for its advanced chip technology to meet diverse AI needs, possibly serving both Nvidia and AMD. Samsung is also intensifying efforts to increase offerings of high-end solid-state drive (SSD) products to meet the surging demand for AI servers.

As Samsung aims to strengthen its foothold in the high-end memory chip market, it foresees tight supply conditions toward the year-end due to the concentration of capacity on HBM production, echoing similar sentiments from SK Hynix.

In the first quarter, Samsung witnessed a significant revenue increase, driven by a substantial rise in memory chip sales amidst the AI boom. Operating profit surged to its highest level since 2022, marking a significant turnaround for Samsung’s chip division, which had previously suffered losses.

Despite facing challenges such as rising costs impacting margins, particularly with the launch of its flagship Galaxy S24 smartphones, Samsung remains bullish about the role of AI features in driving sales. The company reported that a significant portion of customers were attracted to the S24 phones for their AI capabilities, signaling a positive outlook for Samsung in the AI-driven market.

As Samsung continues to navigate the dynamic landscape of the semiconductor industry, its strategic focus on AI-driven technologies positions it favorably to capitalize on the burgeoning demand for high-performance chips in various sectors.

Continue Reading


Biden Allocates $6.4 Billion Grants to Enhance Samsung’s Chip Production in Texas




In a strategic move to fortify domestic chipmaking capabilities, the Biden administration has pledged up to $6.4 billion in grants to South Korea’s tech giant, Samsung Electronics. This substantial investment aims to propel the expansion of Samsung’s chip production facilities in central Texas, serving as a pivotal component of a broader initiative to bolster the United States semiconductor industry.

As detailed by the Department of Commerce on Monday, the funding, allocated under the 2022 Chips and Science Act, will facilitate the establishment of two cutting-edge chip production facilities, alongside a dedicated research center and packaging facility in Taylor, Texas. Additionally, the infusion of funds will empower Samsung to enhance its existing semiconductor facility in Austin, Texas. This expansion is poised to cater to the burgeoning demands of US customers and bolster chip output across critical sectors such as aerospace, defense, and automotive industries, thereby strengthening national security.

Commerce Department Secretary Gina Raimondo emphasized that these investments are pivotal in reinstating US leadership in semiconductor manufacturing, and advancing capabilities in design, production, and research and development. The move aligns with the administration’s broader agenda to mitigate reliance on overseas chip production, particularly in regions like China and Taiwan.

Samsung Electronics Co-CEO Kyung Kye Hyun reiterated the company’s commitment to meeting the anticipated surge in demand for advanced products like AI chips. Samsung’s facilities are poised to be equipped with state-of-the-art process technologies, enhancing the security of the US semiconductor supply chain.

Anticipated to commence production in 2026, Samsung’s venture into chip manufacturing in Texas represents a significant stride toward revitalizing domestic semiconductor capabilities. Analysts project the company’s initial focus on producing 4-nanometer chips, with potential expansion into 2-nanometer chips in the future.

The Biden administration’s grant to Samsung marks a crucial step in its efforts to strengthen the US semiconductor industry. Intending to reduce dependence on foreign supply chains, particularly in Taiwan, the initiative seeks to address vulnerabilities in the global semiconductor landscape.

Republican U.S. Senator from Texas, John Cornyn, emphasized the significance of investing in cutting-edge semiconductor manufacturing to enhance national security and competitiveness while creating employment opportunities in Texas.

Samsung’s investment in Texas is expected to amount to approximately $45 billion by the decade’s end, signaling a significant commitment to bolstering American chip production. The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) applauded Samsung’s bold investment and commended the US Commerce Department for advancing the manufacturing incentives and research and development programs outlined in the Chips Act.

In tandem with Intel and TSMC’s recent grant awards, Samsung’s foray into US-based chip manufacturing underscores a concerted effort to strengthen the nation’s semiconductor capabilities, ensuring a secure and resilient supply chain for critical technologies.

Continue Reading


Microsoft’s Latest AI Venture Takes Flight in the Middle East




Microsoft is making a strategic move in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) by investing $1.5 billion in Abu Dhabi’s G42, an AI group that has recently come under scrutiny for its ties to China. This collaboration between the two companies marks Microsoft’s foray into the Middle Eastern AI landscape for the first time, with plans to focus on AI development and digital infrastructure.

Led by Peng Xiao, a Chinese businessman and former CEO of Pegasus, a cybersecurity firm, G42 has faced questions regarding its connections to Beijing. Concerns have been raised, particularly by US officials, regarding the potential for G42 to facilitate the sharing of American technology and data with the Chinese government. However, Xiao has refuted these claims, dismissing them as “misinformation” in a recent interview with CNN.

Despite these concerns, both G42 and Microsoft have emphasized their commitment to adhering to US and international trade regulations as part of their partnership agreement. Microsoft President Brad Smith will even join the G42 board, signaling a deeper collaboration between the two entities.

One of the notable outcomes of this partnership is the development of an Arabic-language AI model named “Jais,” unveiled by G42 last year and hosted on Microsoft’s Azure platform. This initiative underscores the potential for AI to address linguistic and cultural diversity in technology.

Microsoft’s investment in G42 is part of a broader strategy to establish itself as a frontrunner in the AI sector. The company has already formed significant partnerships, including with OpenAI, contributing to its growth in recent years. However, these partnerships have drawn attention from regulators in the United States and Europe, who are wary of Microsoft’s expanding influence in the AI domain.

Beyond the Middle East, Microsoft has been actively pursuing AI investments worldwide. In February, it announced a partnership with Mistral, a leading French AI startup, and committed substantial funding to AI projects in Spain and Germany. This global outreach reflects Microsoft’s vision of ushering in a new era of AI-driven innovation across industries.

As Brad Smith remarked in a recent interview, “It’s all about this new AI era.” With Microsoft’s latest investment in G42 and its ongoing initiatives, the company is poised to play a significant role in shaping the future of AI on a global scale.

Continue Reading


Legislators Introduce Extensive Initiative for Broadening Online Privacy Safeguards



imrs (3)

In a significant move towards enhancing digital privacy, lawmakers have unveiled a comprehensive plan aimed at expanding protections for online users. The initiative, introduced by legislators, outlines a sweeping framework designed to bolster privacy safeguards across various digital platforms.

The proposed measures encompass a wide array of online activities, addressing concerns surrounding data collection, tracking, and user consent. Among the key provisions are stricter regulations on how tech companies handle user data, increased transparency requirements, and provisions for stronger user control over personal information.

Under the proposed plan, online platforms would be required to provide clear and accessible information about their data practices, including details on what information is collected, how it is used, and with whom it is shared. Additionally, users would have greater control over their privacy settings, with options to limit data collection and tracking.

The initiative also aims to strengthen enforcement mechanisms, empowering regulatory agencies to hold tech companies accountable for violations of user privacy rights. Penalties for non-compliance could include hefty fines and other punitive measures to ensure adherence to the new regulations.

Furthermore, the proposed plan includes provisions for greater collaboration between industry stakeholders, policymakers, and advocacy groups to foster dialogue and consensus on privacy-related issues. This collaborative approach seeks to balance the need for privacy protection with the innovation and competitiveness of the digital economy.

The unveiling of this extensive initiative represents a significant step forward in addressing growing concerns about online privacy and data protection. By establishing a robust framework for safeguarding user privacy rights, lawmakers aim to create a safer and more transparent digital environment for all.

As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders from across the tech industry, civil society, and government will closely monitor developments, anticipating the potential impact of these proposed reforms on the digital landscape. With privacy concerns continuing to dominate public discourse, the need for effective and comprehensive privacy protections has never been more pressing.



Continue Reading


FTC looks at TikTok’s security and privacy practices




Under the condition of anonymity, the Federal Trade Commission is looking into TikTok’s data and security policies.

For the social media network, which is already in danger of a possible US ban or being forced to separate from its Chinese parent firm, the investigation is just one more hurdle.

According to the sources, TikTok is being investigated by the FTC for allegedly breaking the Children’s Online Privacy Protection rule, which mandates that businesses get parental permission before collecting any data from children under the age of 13.

According to the sources, the agency is also looking into whether TikTok broke the FTC Act by refusing to allow users’ data to be accessed by those in China. This provision of the Act forbids “unfair or deceptive” business activities.

One of the sources claims that in the upcoming weeks, the FTC may file a lawsuit against TikTok or reach a settlement with the business. Politico first broke the story of the investigation.

“No comment,” was the response given by FTC Director of Public Affairs Douglas Farrar when questioned about the probe.

An instant comment was not received from TikTok.

The US existential danger to TikTok is the reason behind the FTC investigation. A bipartisan group in the US House of Representatives voted earlier this month to enact legislation mandating that ByteDance sell TikTok or else it would be removed from US app stores. President Joe Biden has stated he would sign the law if it reaches his desk, and it is currently before the Senate. However, Senate leaders have stated that they are proceeding methodically, which may cause delays or bring the House bill to an end.

The Chinese corporation ByteDance, which owns the short-form video company, has refuted claims that its app risks US citizens’ national security.

According to TikTok, which is not present in China, the Chinese government has never accessed user data from Americans.

Cybersecurity experts claim that ByteDance is obligated by Chinese law to comply with the nation’s intelligence requests. This could potentially jeopardize US user data, as ByteDance owns TikTok. To solve that problem, TikTok has implemented internal protocols that restrict access by non-US workers and moved its user data from US users onto cloud servers run by US tech giant Oracle.

After BuzzFeed News revealed in 2022 that ByteDance employees had obtained US user data many times, TikTok admitted to Congress in 2022 that staff based in China could access such data. In his initial testimony before Congress last year, TikTok CEO Shou Chew confessed that a “misguided attempt” to find leakers within the company led to the firing of numerous ByteDance workers for spying on specific US journalists.


Continue Reading