Connect with us


Elon Musk will birth Ron DeSantis’ presidential campaign on Twitter Areas



Elon Musk will birth Ron DeSantis’ presidential campaign on Twitter Areas

“For Twitter to deserve public have faith, it desires to be politically neutral,” Twitter proprietor Elon Musk tweeted(opens in a brand new tab) a cramped bit of over a year prior to now, quickly after announcing his acquisition of the platform.

Quickly forward to straight away. Musk now officially owns Twitter, replies dazzling unheard of solely to moral-flit influencers, promotes(opens in a brand new tab) a ways-moral conspiracy(opens in a brand new tab) theories, and is now getting infected about the Republican presidential predominant races.

On Tuesday, NBC News reported(opens in a brand new tab) that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis became planning to officially yell his candidacy for President of the united states in a Twitter Dwelling, the provider’s audio chat platform, on Wednesday evening. No longer handiest that, but Twitter proprietor Elon Musk himself would join DeSantis in the Twitter Dwelling to understand part in the campaign birth.

Musk confirmed his participation in DeSantis’ presidential campaign birth with a retweet of Fox News’ Bill Melugin.

Tweet may perchance possibly perchance even fair were deleted
(opens in a brand new tab)

“BREAKING: @FoxNews confirms Florida Governor @RonDeSantis will yell his 2024 Presidential jog tomorrow evening, 6pm ET in a Twitter Areas interview with @elonmusk,” learn Melugin’s tweet(opens in a brand new tab) which Musk shared to his bigger than 140 million followers.

Musk has previously shared his give a take hang of to for DeSantis on Twitter. In a June 2022 tweet, for instance, Musk spoke back to a conversation exciting his most contemporary vote for a Republican Congressional candidate. He became requested who he’d give a take hang of to for president in 2024.

“DeSantis,” Musk spoke back(opens in a brand new tab).

Tweet may perchance possibly perchance even fair were deleted
(opens in a brand new tab)

In a tweet the following month, Musk reiterated(opens in a brand new tab) his give a take hang of to for DeSantis by sharing that Trump became too former to be president all every other time and that DeSantis would “with out problems compile” in opposition to Biden.

Further solidifying true how this conversation between Musk and DeSantis will jog is the launched moderator, David Sacks. Sacks is a tech VC who has previously shared his give a take hang of to for DeSantis and even hosted a fundraiser for the governor. Sacks is additionally a shut confidant of Musk who aided in the transition following Musk’s takeover of Twitter.

DeSantis enters a predominant jog that as a lot as now parts Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, outmoded Governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley, and naturally outmoded president Donald Trump.

Trump has been feuding with DeSantis for months now, looking ahead to the latter’s unheard of-rumored entrance into the jog. And whereas Trump has yet to touch upon Musk’s participation in the campaign birth, the outmoded president has additionally feuded online with Musk sooner than. It be handiest a matter of time sooner than Trump takes unprejudiced at Musk all every other time.

Sahil Sachdeva is the CEO of Level Up Holdings, a Personal Branding agency. He creates elite personal brands through social media growth and top tier press features.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Apple departs the project for an electric car




Apple has scrapped its intentions to launch a self-driving electric car, a project that had been under development for almost ten years.

Based on a person briefed on the discussion, who requested anonymity because the announcement was not public, the company informed employees in an internal meeting on Tuesday that it had shelved the project and that members of the group would be shifted to different roles, including in Apple’s artificial intelligence division.

According to the individual, Kevin Lynch, an executive who worked on the automobile project, will be reporting to John Giannandrea, the head of artificial intelligence strategy at the firm, as part of the restructure.

Apple said it would not comment. Bloomberg had earlier broken the story that Apple was discontinuing its auto program.

Apple had not revealed their automobile to the public, but since it was being tested on public roads, it had been one of Silicon Valley’s worst-kept secrets for a long time. Apple rarely cancels initiatives of this magnitude since it usually doesn’t shelve projects with this level of public attention.

The company has had difficulty in recent years in identifying fresh growth opportunities since the market has become saturated with its crucial iPhone and consumers are not replacing their phones as frequently as they once did.

Apple CEO Tim Cook has made it known that the company is considering getting into the auto industry. Additionally, the business has been conducting long-term public testing of hundreds of cars with autonomous driving capabilities. Internally known as Titan and Project 172, the car proved to be a difficult product to create, resulting in the closure of some divisional operations, the reworking and scrapping of plans, and the layoff of numerous employees.

Apple invested billions of dollars in the development of the vehicle, which was meant to compete with Tesla’s electric cars, which have features for autonomous driving.

The product was crucial to Mr. Cook’s legacy because it dispelled the idea that Apple was no longer capable of inventing new ideas and creating the next big thing. The company has launched a limited number of new hardware products under Mr. Cook’s direction, such as the HomePod smart speaker, which was a failure, the $3,500 Vision Pro goggles that it released this month to compete with Meta’s virtual reality headsets, and the Apple Watch, which currently leads the smartwatch market.

The business has made significant investments in creating new technology. It has invested $113 billion in research and development over the past five years.

Continue Reading


Landmark Social Media Cases Set for US Supreme Court Hearing





This week, the US Supreme Court will consider two issues that have the potential to completely change the way the internet functions, and they will ultimately determine what content citizens can view on social media.

In light of the crucial role that social media platforms currently play in contemporary American life, the court will hear arguments on Monday over whether to grant Texas and Florida noticeably more power over these sites and their contents.

The main question is: Can these platforms determine what can be deleted off their sites and what should remain on them?

The states seek to prevent users’ posts from being removed from Facebook, Tik-Tok, YouTube, and other platforms; these messages may even encourage hate speech or eating disorders, mislead voters about elections, or do other illegal activities. However, the First Amendment is being pressed against by that push.

Even the way that Americans learn about the 2024 elections—from Instagram to X and beyond—may alter if the states win their case.

Officials from Texas and Florida contend that their laws restricting content moderation are lawful because they aim to control the business practices of social media platforms rather than the speech on them. However, opponents, such as the industry organization Net Choice, are trying to invalidate both measures on the grounds that they violate the First Amendment rights of the platforms themselves and that their scope may have far-reaching unforeseen repercussions.

For instance, a group of political scientists informed the court that the laws don’t provide social media platforms enough latitude to moderate threats against election officials and instead force them to consider “dangerous and violent election-related speech” the same as non-violent speech.

Is it constitutional to limit content moderation?


The Supreme Court will decide whether states can prevent social media companies from censoring or removing user content that violates platform rules on Monday in the cases of Net Choice v. Paxton and Moody v. Net-Choice.

Individuals may also file lawsuits against tech companies under the relevant state legislation for suspected infractions.

Although the legislation in Texas and Florida are somewhat wide, state representatives claim that the regulations will prevent social media platforms from unjustly suppressing conservatives. Social media companies have maintained for years that right-wing discourse is not subject to discrimination.

Florida’s SB 7072, which was signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis in 2021, forbids digital platforms from deleting or suspending political candidates’ accounts within the state. Violators risk harsh penalties of up to $250,000 a day. In addition, it gives users of social media the ability to legally sue platforms if they feel that they have been wrongfully restricted or “deplatformed.

Any major social media platform that wishes to “block, ban, remove, deplatform, demonetize, de-boost, restrict, deny equal access or visibility to, or otherwise discriminate against expression” is in violation of a Texas legislation that was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott in 2021. Texas’ HB 20 allows individual internet users to sue social media companies for alleged infractions, much like the Florida legislation does.


Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, center, gives his opening remarks flanked by local state delegation members prior to signing legislation that seeks to punish social media platforms that remove conservative ideas from their sites, inside Florida International University’s MARC building in Miami on Monday, May 24, 2021. Carl Juste/Miami Herald/AP

Even though the First Amendment only protects governments and not private companies, the states claim that social media platforms have become so significant as a new public square that new laws are required to force them to abide by the principles of free speech.

The IT sector claims that the restrictions go against the corporations’ First Amendment freedom to select what speech is acceptable on their exclusive platforms.

Regarding the dispute, lower courts are divided.

The US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2022 that social media companies do not possess “a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say” in the Texas law case.

However, the same year, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals declared that Florida’s “restrictions are substantially likely to violate the First Amendment,” reasoning that governments are not allowed to “speak” on social media platforms, even when it is through user-generated content.

The Supreme Court could now definitively end that argument.

Do IT corporations resemble public utilities or publishers more?


The Net Choice cases demonstrate the stark differences in how different people view social media. The state regulations’ proponents contend that social media ought to tolerate all speech without censoring its content. The platforms should have the authority to choose what content they show, according to critics.

Roughly twelve states, headed by Republican attorneys general, have petitioned the Supreme Court to support the laws in Texas and Florida, claiming that social media businesses should be subject to the same regulations as utilities like the phone network.

In his own court filing, the former president Donald Trump contended that social media businesses “act like railroads carrying freight, telegraph companies transmitting messages, or airlines carrying passengers.”

However, the Biden administration stated in a brief from last year that social media businesses are more like cable and newspaper corporations in that they are free to select what they show and have the same constitutional safeguards against government speech regulations.


A pedestrian uses a smartphone in front of a store in Walnut Creek, California, in January 2022. David Paul Morris/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The state laws, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a consumer advocacy organization, would have “absurd results” if they were implemented because they would provide con artists, trolls, and nasty radicals with a justification to bombard websites with claims of censorship.

“A major setback to efforts to combat spam,” according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, “because every action to limit the spread of spam messages might be considered an impermissible ban’ under the law.”

Internet users ultimately gain by allowing social media services to remain free from government intervention in their content moderation, according to David Greene, senior staff attorney and civil liberties director at EFF, who spoke with CNN. “Platforms can create unique forums that accommodate a range of viewpoints, interests, and beliefs when they are granted the First Amendment right to curate the user-generated content they publish.”

Beyond what is seen on specific websites, the court’s ruling in the NetChoice cases may have far-reaching implications.

If Texas and Florida win, the precedent that forbids governments from “compelling speech”—that is, compelling private citizens to say something against their will—might be altered. For instance, a 1974 judgment found that a Florida statute that mandated the publication of a political candidate’s remarks in newspapers was unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

Critics of the Texas and Florida laws argue that forcing social media companies to post all speech, even if the platforms would prefer to remove it, would amount to coerced speech and would mark a major and dangerous shift in the interpretation of the First Amendment.

According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, it might result in the exact kind of government meddling that the First Amendment was intended to prevent.

In a brief, that group stated, “The larger the platform the state seeks to control, the greater will be the state’s influence on public and political discourse.”

Continue Reading


For the first time in years, Reddit files for an IPO on social media




Reddit, a message board website with a community focus, filed to go public on Thursday. This makes it the first significant social media business to go on the stock market in years and a test for private companies following a decline in IPOs.

Reddit revealed its financial results in an offering prospectus before it started selling investors shares. The San Francisco-based business revealed that last year saw a decline in losses despite a more than 20% increase in revenue. It also said that there were over 100,000 active communities and 73 million daily users.

The 18-year-old company is scheduled to meet with possible investors to pique their interest in purchasing its shares, and the prospectus initiates a process to the stock market. In a few weeks, Reddit may list as a public company on the New York Stock Exchange with the ticker name RDDT. Two people familiar with the subject claim that Reddit’s financiers are attempting to value the company in its initial public offering (IPO) at least $5 billion. That is almost 50% of the $10 billion valuation that the business obtained in a private funding round in 2021. The pricing may possibly change in the coming weeks as the negotiations are still ongoing.

Reddit is the final social media company from a previous age to pursue the stock market, following the successful offerings of Facebook (2012), Twitter (2013), and Snap (2017). Since then, the social media landscape has evolved, coming under fire for spreading false information, inciting hate speech, and other issues. A few of the businesses have changed their names: Elon Musk purchased Twitter, renaming it X after taking it private in 2022, while Facebook changed its name to Meta.

Another highly anticipated move following a slowdown in initial public offerings is Reddit’s plan. Based on data provided by Renaissance Capital, only 108 companies in the US went public last year, or around 25% fewer than that of 2021. The largest tech products available at the end of the previous year included the supermarket delivery service Instacart and the chip designer Arm.

Reddit CEO Steve Huffman stated in a founder’s letter that was included with the prospectus, “We are going public to advance our mission and become a stronger company.” We anticipate that our community will gain significantly from going public as well. Our users feel a strong sense of responsibility for the communities they build on Reddit.

“This sense of ownership to be reflected in real ownership — for our users to be our owners,” Mr. Huffman continued, adding that “becoming a public company makes this possible.” Reddit announced that, should they choose to buy them, it will set aside a portion of its shares for 75,000 of its most active users at the I.P.O. price.

Reddit stated in its prospectus that its revenue for 2023 was $804 million, increasing around 21% from $666 million in the previous year. According to the prospectus, the company lost $90 million in 2023 as opposed to $158 million the previous year.

Advance Magazine Publishers, Tencent Cloud Europe, Vy Capital, Fidelity Management, and Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI and a former member of the Reddit board, are a few of its biggest investors.

Reddit has had a difficult and drawn-out journey to the public markets. Established in 2005 by Mr. Huffman and Alexis Ohanian in a University of Virginia dorm room, the website started out as a place where people could gather anonymously to talk about anything from guitars, makeup, and power washers to popular TV shows.

The website was distinctive in that it was primarily centered around close-knit, largely anonymous communities that were all supervised by volunteers who self-managed their forums, or “subreddits,” according to guidelines they had created. It gained notoriety for its “A.M.A.s,” or “ask me anything” sessions, in which popular personalities such as actor Nicolas Cage, Microsoft’s Bill Gates, and former President Barack Obama participated.

Over the years, the company has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in capital, with two financing rounds in 2021 raising over $410 million and $250 million, respectively. Tencent Holdings, Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, and Fidelity Investments are among the investors. Reddit initially rejected selling ads and turning a profit, much like other early social networking initiatives. Rather, it concentrated on revenue streams derived from community initiatives, such as an e-commerce system created by users and rewards that users could purchase from one another. Those concepts are still relevant.

Reddit’s topic-focused communities eventually led to the platform accepting advertising. For example, brands such as Laneige focused advertisements to one of the busiest subreddits, Makeup Addiction, where members talk about cosmetics and application techniques.

The website has also developed a growing data licensing business on the back of its massive chat data corpus, which has grown in significance among the AI craze. Massive amounts of this kind of data are used to train A.I. models, making them more sophisticated. Reddit and Google signed a licensing agreement on Thursday. Reddit data has been utilized by Google to train and develop its artificial intelligence systems.

In the letter, Mr. Huffman stated, “We expect our data advantage and intellectual property to continue to be a key element in the training of” future artificial intelligence models. According to the filing, the corporation expects to make upward of $203 million from many undisclosed licensing agreements for the use of its data over the next three years.

The website has experienced some difficulties. Its initial failure to accommodate moderate communities sparked scandal after controversy, including its part in disseminating false information during the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing and its hosting of racist and misogynistic content in some of its smaller subreddits.When Reddit changed some of its policies and forbade outside developers from using the site’s material without paying for it, users revolted against the platform last year.

In recent years, Reddit has changed its stance on moderation and updated and enforced its standards more tightly, which has made it more appealing for advertisers to insert ads throughout the site.

Before Mr. Huffman rejoined the site’s leadership in 2015, the company had four chief executives over its first ten years of operation.

Reddit warned prospective investors about the difficulties and risks it might face as a publicly traded company. These risks included the emergence of massive language models and the underlying A.I. systems that might be used to synthesize and aggregate content from the site and allow users to view Reddit without ever visiting the website or seeing advertisements.

The market for digital ads, which is dominated by Google and Meta, may also make it tough for the startup to attract brands.

Given the difference between its platform’s capabilities and the best in class, Eric Seufert, an independent mobile analyst who keeps a close eye on social media businesses and advertising, believes Reddit may have a difficult time expanding its advertising business.

Additionally, the corporation issued a warning, stating that future uprisings or exits could negatively impact the platform since it was mostly relied on its community for platform moderation.

“We have a lot to do and a lot of opportunities,” Mr. Huffman stated.


Continue Reading


Plans to Increase Chip Manufacturing in the United States Are Facing Challenges




The primary manufacturer of the most advanced chips in the world, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, announced in December 2022 that it will invest $40 billion in Arizona to establish its first significant U.S. base for semiconductor production.

The much-heralded project in Phoenix, which includes two new plants, one of which has more sophisticated equipment, came to represent President Biden’s efforts to increase domestic chip production. Chips are silicon slices that are used in a wide range of devices to perform computations and store data.

Then, last summer, TSMC announced that local workers lacked the experience to install some advanced equipment, delaying the start of manufacture at its first Arizona factory until 2025 instead of this year.

The business stated last month that it will not be producing chips at the second factory until 2027 or 2028, instead of 2026, due to uncertainty around federal funding and tech choices.

In an investor call, TSMC chairman Mark Liu stated that the Arizona site’s progress is partially dependent on “how much incentives that the U.S. government can provide.”

TSMC is just one of numerous chip manufacturers that are encountering difficulties with their plans to expand into the United States. Due to pressure to control their expenditure on new infrastructure following a decline in sales of many different types of chips, businesses like Intel, Microchip Technology, and others have also modified their manufacturing schedules. The creation of new chip plants is extremely complex, requiring billions of dollars’ worth of machinery, thousands of personnel, and extended construction deadlines.

The delays occur as the Biden administration starts distributing the first significant grants from a $39 billion fund intended to strengthen the American semiconductor sector and lessen the country’s reliance on technology produced in East Asia. The administration announced on Monday that it would give the chipmaker GlobalFoundries $1.5 billion in incentives to modernize and expand its facilities in Vermont and New York, where it produces chips for the defense and automotive industries.

However, the problems that businesses like TSMC are having with their projects may overshadow this publicity and cast doubt on the viability of President Biden’s industrial policy agenda. Over the next months, Mr. Biden’s reelection campaign is anticipated to place a significant emphasis on the investments.

“As of yet, nothing has failed,” stated Emily Kilcrease, senior fellow and head of the energy, economics, and security program at the Washington-based think tank, Center for a New American Security. However, for the program to be deemed successful, some advancement and the actual opening of those plants within the following few years are required.

Federal funds under the 2022 CHIPS Act are to be distributed by the Commerce Department to promote domestic chip manufacturing. Apart from the funding given to GlobalFoundries, the government has already awarded two minor grants for production. In the upcoming weeks and months, chipmakers including TSMC, Intel, Samsung, and Micron are anticipated to get substantially greater awards totaling billions of dollars.

The quantity and timing of the awards are the subject of intricate discussions between the government and these large chipmakers. Businesses are still awaiting word from the Treasury Department over which investments will be eligible for a new advanced manufacturing tax credit, which was supposed to be announced before the end of 2023.

Analysts warned that as the world races to lessen its reliance on semiconductor manufacturing in China, South Korea, and Taiwan, any delays in the process could be detrimental to the United States. Competing nations are providing court chip producers with their own incentives. For instance, TSMC intends to increase production not only in the US but also in Germany and Japan.

According to Jimmy Goodrich, a senior adviser for technology analysis at the RAND Corporation, “the more other geographies are going to snap up these investments, and more leading-edge investments will be made in East Asia,” the longer the U.S. government delays in allocating benefits. Thus, the timer is running out.

Rejecting claims that the Department of Commerce had been tardy to provide incentives was a Commerce Department official. According to him, the department is taking its time to safeguard taxpayer interests and encourage businesses to take further steps to strengthen the local chip supply chain.

According to a White House official, the timetable modifications made by the semiconductor makers were small tweaks that were typical of intricate projects like the new production facilities. 

Forecasts, he continued, indicated that when the plants began producing these chips, there would be an enormous demand for them.

According to a spokeswoman for the Treasury Department, officials there have clarified tax incentives for businesses preparing investments and are striving to release more guidelines as soon as feasible.

The CHIPS Act enabled tax credits for investments in factories and manufacturing equipment, along with grants and other incentives to increase U.S. chip production. According to the Commerce Department, over 600 businesses and organizations had expressed interest in receiving grants; thus far, the department has estimated that private investment pledges have totaled $235 billion.

However, the majority of expansion plans were made during a period of chip scarcity a few years ago, following a surge in consumer spending on electronics driven by the pandemic. Chip manufacturers were left with large stocks of unsold components and little urgent need for new factories when that market dried up.According to Thomas Sonderman, CEO of SkyWater Technologies, a Minnesota semiconductor company that has received Defense Department subsidies and is vying for CHIPS Act funds, “companies are rethinking how and what and when investments will occur.”

Microchip, an Arizona-based company, is one chip manufacturer that is struggling. Microchip was inundated with orders two years ago. 

It is eligible to receive $162 million after applying for CHIPS Act money to boost manufacturing. However, it has announced two separate two-week plant shutdowns as sales have declined.

According to its CEO, Ganesh Moorthy, Microchip still intends to modernize the plants in Oregon and Colorado that are going to get grants under the CHIPS Act. However, purchasing machinery to boost output will have to wait until things pick up for the company.

“We’ve put off expanding,” Mr. Moorthy declared.

In addition to increasing output, Intel has modified its procurement of expensive manufacturing equipment. The business recently stated that it had not anticipated beginning production in Ohio in 2025, as it had previously anticipated, despite investing $20 billion in two new factories there. The Wall Street Journal first reported on the adjustment.


Intel employees inside a “clean room” at a facility in Oregon in 2021.Credit…Philip Cheung for The New York Times

Intel reiterated that construction on the site and expansion plans in the United States and three other countries remained unaffected, despite external factors. Keyvan Esfarjani, the executive vice president overseeing Intel’s manufacturing operations, emphasized that the company’s strategy remained consistent over time.

While some chip manufacturers like Texas Instruments and Micron Technology are forging ahead with expanding chip production to maintain competitiveness, Intel remains committed to its course. Micron, for instance, is proceeding with the construction of a $15 billion factory in Boise, Idaho, and has plans for an even larger manufacturing complex near Syracuse, N.Y., despite market challenges in its memory chip segment.


Construction in 2021 in Chandler, Ariz., where Intel is building two factories. Credit…Philip Cheung for The New York Times

Scott Gatzemeier, a Micron vice president overseeing expansion efforts, stressed the importance of aligning construction projects with future chip demand rather than current market conditions. He highlighted the significant expenses involved in renting equipment, securing construction workers, and emphasized the need to avoid halting projects once started due to the potential for increased costs.

Some chip manufacturers are hesitant to commence construction without government funding. For instance, Mr. Sonderman of SkyWater mentioned that his company’s plans for a $1.8 billion facility in Indiana are contingent on securing funds through a portion of the CHIPS Act dedicated to research.

At TSMC’s Arizona site, unforeseen challenges have arisen over the past year. Construction unions raised concerns about workplace safety and objected to the employment of workers from Taiwan to install sophisticated equipment in the first factory. Delays in machine installation prompted an announcement in July regarding production delays.

In December, TSMC and the Arizona Building and Construction Trades Council reached agreements on ground rules at the site to address safety, workplace training, staffing, and other issues. Mr. Liu, who recently announced plans to retire, expressed optimism that tensions among workers had eased.

While acknowledging challenges in building the first Phoenix factory, Mr. Liu emphasized that TSMC remains among the fastest in completing such projects compared to its peers. Although the start of production at the second factory may be delayed, Mr. Liu indicated that worker skills are unlikely to be a significant factor, expressing confidence that construction of the second fab will proceed more smoothly, citing the quick learning abilities of workers in Arizona.


Continue Reading


Gateway to the Moon: SpaceX’s Historic Commercial Lander Mission




Early on Thursday, a robotic spacecraft was launched by a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket to the moon, preparing it for a landing on February 22. Should the landing be successful, it would be the first commercial vehicle to set foot on the lunar surface and the first soft landing for the United States since the final Apollo missions.

Launchpad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center is where the Falcon 9 rocket took off at 1:05 a.m. Eastern time. This is the same pad from which a Saturn V rocket carried the astronauts of Apollo 17 on their mission to the moon in 1972. It carried a spacecraft built by the Houston-based business Intuitive Machines. Nobody was on board.

Under a contract with NASA, which is paying Intuitive Machines $118 million to send many payloads to the moon, the mission is being carried out. NASA views the project as a component of its Artemis campaign, which aims to return astronauts to the moon.

NASA program scientist Debra Needham stated in a pre-launch briefing that the Nova-C lander, named Odysseus, comes with instruments “to demonstrate technologies that will enhance the efficiency, precision and safety of future spacecraft landing as well as investigate the surface of the south polar region of the moon.”

However, NASA is really just a paying customer in a private sector-driven project that consists of a commercial spacecraft being launched by a commercial rocket. This is a model that NASA is depending more and more on for its exploration efforts both inside and outside of Earth orbit.

Joel Kearns, NASA’s deputy assistant administrator for exploration in the scientific mission directorate, stated that six years ago, American industry declared that they were prepared for NASA to hire them to perform robotic lunar landings as a service rather than having us do it ourselves. The initial missions “are an assessment of that.

The landing attempt by Intuitive Machines comes after that of Astrobotic, a private company that was contracted by NASA and launched its spacecraft to the moon last month. However, a propulsion system malfunction kept the spacecraft from reaching the moon, which foiled its effort to land.

NASA has stated that it is possible for some of the missions to fail. However, its founders assert that they plan to learn from even their mistakes and have arranged for businesses to attempt robotic landings, or as they put it, “take shots on goal.” As part of what it refers to as its Commercial Lunar Program, NASA officials have stated that they expect to have at least two robotic flights to the moon every year during the next few years.

Entering this… Since no American company has sent a robotic spacecraft to the moon since 1968 and the last Apollo mission took place in 1972, we didn’t think success was certain for these American firms making their first lunar landing, Kearns added. “I can assure you that with each endeavor, we gain knowledge and insight.

The goal of Intuitive Machines is thus a dangerous one. Furthermore, the launch of its fourteen-foot-tall, six-landing-leg Odysseus spacecraft is only the beginning of a dangerous, long head to the moon surface. If it is successful, it will land near the lunar south pole, an area NASA hopes to investigate with humans due to the potential existence of water in the form of ice in the craters that are continuously shaded there. Since water is necessary for human survival and because its constituent elements, oxygen and hydrogen, can be used as rocket fuel to enable further solar system research, it is essential to any extended lunar expedition.

China is also interested in exploring the area around the moon’s south pole, where NASA, unlike Apollo, hopes to establish a long-term presence.

Kearns stated, “We’re not trying to redo Apollo.” In an effort to address important scientific issues, we are pursuing technological and scientific research that was not even considered during the Apollo era, and we’re going to a section of the moon that neither humans nor robots have ever been, just for this mission with [Intuitive Machines] and Artemis, to really explore for new things, including whether there are actually useable volatiles like water ice on the moon’s south pole.

Furthermore, Odysseus is carrying NASA equipment made to take pictures of the particles the spacecraft’s engines create. The space agency wants to learn more about the impact of landings on the moon’s surface and ecosystem because it eventually hopes to land many spacecraft in close proximity to one another.

According to Susan Lederer, NASA’s project scientist for the Intuitive Machines mission, “it’s going to cause the dust to really churn up and create a big plume of dust.” “Therefore, it will involve utilizing a pair of cameras to observe the rising plume of dust.”

This will enable “future landers to be developed to better protect against the dust that’s being churned up,” according to her statement.

Additionally, the spacecraft is equipped with a camera system that was created by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University instructors and students. This camera system will be released from the spacecraft approximately 100 feet above the moon’s surface in order to capture pictures of the vehicle throughout the landing procedure.

Continue Reading


According to Mark Zuckerberg, Meta will ‘keep things lean,’ investing heavily in AI while holding down on staffing




Mark Zuckerberg is extending his “year of efficiency” indefinitely because he is so happy with it.


After Meta revealed fourth-quarter financials that easily exceeded analysts’ projections, Zuckerberg stated he wanted to “keep things lean” and has no plans to increase hiring on Thursday’s earnings call.


The company’s headcount, which peaked well over 86,000 in 2022, decreased 22% to 67,317 last year as a result of massive expense reductions implemented by Meta to pacify investors who had lost faith in the company’s capacity to adapt to shifting market conditions. At the time, Apple’s 2021 iOS upgrade was still having an impact on Meta, and the digital ad industry remained competitive.


During an earnings call exactly a year prior, Zuckerberg informed analysts that the management’s focus for 2023 will be the “year of efficiency.”


Since then, Wall Street has rewarded him. The stock nearly tripled in value in the previous year, ranking second in the S&P 500 behind only Nvidia. Last month, it broke a record, and the market capitalization of Meta has already surpassed $1 trillion due to the ongoing upswing.


Meta revealed on Thursday that its fourth-quarter sales increased by 25% to $40.1 billion, the quickest rate of growth since mid-2021. Operating margin more than doubled to 41%, and net income shot up a massive 201% to $14 billion. Throughout prolonged trading, the stock rose 15%.


When all things are considered, Meta is demonstrating that it can develop at a healthy rate and drastically reduce costs—which decreased by 8% from the previous year. The firm is so sure of its financial standing that it approved a $50 billion share purchase and announced it would pay a 50-cent quarterly dividend for the first time.


Not that Zuckerberg isn’t prepared to spend cash. All he wants to do is avoid doing it on humans.


During the call, Zuckerberg explained that his roadmap calls for creating a “world-class compute infrastructure,” which entails shelling out billions of dollars for the AI chips from Nvidia that Meta needs to train its models.


“We intend to win this game, so we’ll keep investing heavily in this space to create the most cutting-edge clusters,” Zuckerberg stated. “We’re also creating our own custom silicon that is tailored for our workloads and designing innovative data centers.”


“Even after 2024”


According to Meta, annual spending will range from $94 billion to $99 billion, up from $88.15 billion in 2023. Capital expenditures will be between $30 billion and $37 billion, according to finance chief Susan Li, “a $2 billion increase of the high end of our prior range.”


However, Zuckerberg stated that the era of rapid expansion is now in the past when it comes to employment. Zuckerberg stated that while Meta still intends to hire this year for high-paying technical positions, the headcount growth will be “relatively minimal compared to what we would have done historically.”


“I think it’s the right thing for us to do culturally to keep things lean until we get to a point where we’re just really underwater on our ability to execute,” he continued.


If Zuckerberg is to be believed, that’s not just a tale for this year.


“I kind of anticipate that for the foreseeable future, even after 2024,” he remarked.


In the meantime, Meta’s Reality Labs division, which is in charge of creating technologies for augmented and virtual reality, is still losing money and doesn’t seem to be stopping. The division has lost more than $42 billion since late 2020, with a record operational loss of $4.65 billion in the fourth quarter. Revenue surpassed $1 billion for the first time, primarily due to Quest VR headset sales.


The fact that Meta stated that losses at Reality Labs will “increase meaningfully year-over-year” highlights the persistence of Zuckerberg’s conviction that the metaverse will be the computing platform of the future.


Zuckerberg said that the significant cost reductions have allowed Meta to make “different investments where that’s necessary,” thus he is no longer worried about turning off potential investors


“To strengthen us as a technology company and provide us with the flexibility and stability to achieve the long-term objectives is the theme I outlined at the beginning of the year of efficiency last year,” he stated


Continue Reading


SEC Lawsuits on Digital Currencies Reshape the Crypto Landscape



SEC Lawsuits on Digital Currencies Reshape the Crypto Landscape

In the ever-evolving landscape of the cryptocurrency industry, a pivotal moment is approaching as federal judges deliberate on a series of lawsuits brought forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), targeting some of the largest players in the crypto space. For more than a decade, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether have strived to carve out a niche as an alternative branch of finance, free from the constraints of traditional banking and government oversight. However, the industry is now facing a critical juncture as the SEC invokes the Howey Test, a legal analysis established by a 1946 Supreme Court decision, to classify digital currencies as securities.

Cryptocurrency Regulation: A Clash of Ideals

Cryptocurrency’s origins trace back to 2008, with the creation of Bitcoin’s software by an enigmatic figure known as Satoshi Nakamoto. Initially envisioned as a decentralized alternative to conventional finance, the crypto industry has undergone a transformation. As companies resembling traditional finance institutions began developing and aggressively marketing cryptocurrencies, the SEC intensified its scrutiny, viewing the emerging sector as an unregulated version of Wall Street.

Last year alone, the SEC filed 46 crypto-related enforcement actions, citing rampant fraud and manipulation. The regulatory approach hinges on a 1946 Supreme Court case that led to the creation of the Howey Test, a legal standard determining when a financial product becomes a security. Under this framework, a financial product is deemed a security if it offers the chance to invest in a “common enterprise” with the expectation of profiting from other people’s efforts.

SEC Lawsuits on Digital Currencies: The Current Legal Landscape

Over the last 18 months, the SEC escalated its enforcement efforts, alleging that crypto companies operated as unregulated securities businesses. The crypto industry pushed back, asserting that the laws governing Wall Street shouldn’t automatically apply to digital currencies. Early court victories on both sides left the matter unsettled until recently when federal judges began hearings in two pivotal cases against major crypto exchanges – Coinbase and Binance.

The SEC’s lawsuits against these prominent players delve into the core issues of the broader legal battle. Legal experts anticipate that the preliminary rulings expected in the coming weeks could set the stage for a legal showdown that might eventually reach the Supreme Court. The outcome of these cases could reshape the trajectory of the multitrillion-dollar crypto industry in the United States.

Also Read: OpenAI App Store Launched to Unlock The Future of Chatbots

SEC Lawsuits on Digital Currencies: Coinbase and Binance in Focus

The recent hearings in the SEC’s lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance have attracted significant attention. The SEC argues that at least 20 cryptocurrencies traded on these platforms qualify as securities, invoking the Howey Test to support its claims. The industry contends that the SEC is stretching the intent of the Howey Test and overreaching its regulatory authority.

In the Coinbase case, lawyers argue that without a clear contractual agreement between the buyer and the issuer of a digital coin, a cryptocurrency is akin to any other “collectible” that may appreciate in value over time, such as baseball cards or Beanie Babies dolls. Judge Katherine Polk Failla expressed concerns about the SEC’s broad approach, stating that the commission may be “sweeping too broadly.”

On the other hand, the Binance case, presided over by Judge Amy Berman Jackson, has seen skepticism regarding the comparison between digital coins and collectible toys. While expressing concern about the SEC’s strategy, Judge Jackson pressed government lawyers to elucidate the boundaries of their argument.

Regulatory Impact on Crypto Industry: A Balancing Act

The court’s rulings in these high-stakes cases could determine whether the crypto industry continues to thrive within the American financial system or faces limitations that might push startups offshore. The SEC contends that robust oversight is necessary to curb rampant fraud, pointing to the billions of dollars investors lost when the crypto market imploded in 2022.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler argues that most digital currencies qualify as securities under the Howey Test, emphasizing that people invest in crypto with the expectation that the issuing companies will drive prices up. However, the industry challenges this approach, insisting on the need for a formal contract between the seller of a digital coin and an investor for a transaction to constitute a securities transaction.

The Road Ahead: Uncertainties and Optimism

As the crypto industry navigates these legal challenges, the recent approval of a new Bitcoin investment product for trading on Wall Street signals a potential shift. This move comes after a court ruled against the SEC, forcing the agency’s hand. Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, emphasizes the industry’s optimism, stating that the recent developments provide hope and highlight the extraordinary nature of the situation.

In conclusion, the SEC lawsuits on digital currencies are an existential issue for the crypto industry, teetering on the brink of a resolution that could reshape its future in the United States. The next few weeks will be crucial as federal judges deliver preliminary rulings that may pave the way for a legal journey that could ultimately reach the highest court in the land. The clash between regulatory oversight and the decentralized ideals of cryptocurrency is at the forefront, leaving stakeholders eagerly anticipating the unfolding legal drama that will determine the fate of the crypto industry in the United States.

Continue Reading


OpenAI App Store Launched to Unlock The Future of Chatbots



OpenAI App Store Launched to Unlock The Future of Chatbots

In a groundbreaking move, OpenAI has recently introduced the OpenAI App Store, marking a significant expansion in the realm of artificial intelligence applications. The OpenAI App Store is set to redefine how users engage with OpenAI’s flagship technology, ChatGPT, by providing a space for individuals and businesses to share and explore custom chatbots tailored to various needs and services.

Unlocking Customization with ChatGPT Plus

At the heart of this innovation is the ChatGPT Plus subscription service, priced at $20 a month. Subscribers gain exclusive access to the OpenAI App Store, where they can discover a plethora of custom chatbots offering diverse functionalities. From book recommendations to mathematics tutoring and scientific paper searches, the store aims to cater to a broad spectrum of user interests.

OpenAI’s vision for the GPT Store is clear – it’s a platform designed to connect businesses and customers seamlessly. For users who have long admired ChatGPT’s underlying technology, GPT-4, seasoned developers have utilized it to build applications such as search engines and automated tutors. Now, with the OpenAI App Store, the horizon broadens as individuals and small businesses, even those lacking software development experience, can distribute apps based on this advanced technology.

Strategic Investment and Growth

OpenAI’s move into the for-profit domain has been marked by strategic investments, including a notable $13 billion injection from Microsoft over the past four years. With talks underway for a deal potentially valuing the company at over $80 billion, OpenAI is positioned as a formidable competitor to tech giants like Google.

The Rise of ChatGPT Team

Alongside the OpenAI App Store, OpenAI has introduced ChatGPT Team, a specialized version catering to businesses and groups. Priced at $25 to $30 per user per month, ChatGPT Team ensures data privacy, assuring users that any information shared through the service will not be utilized to train OpenAI’s A.I. technologies. This move caters to the growing demand for secure and private communication channels within corporate environments.

Also Read: Artificial Intelligence in Education: Transformative Visions and Historical Parallels

Diversification and Integration

OpenAI’s recent enhancements to ChatGPT go beyond the App Store. The integration of DALL-E image generator into ChatGPT, along with a version that interacts with users through spoken words, mirrors the evolving landscape of AI technologies. These enhancements position ChatGPT as a versatile tool capable of meeting a myriad of user needs.

Empowering Users: GPTs for All

In November, OpenAI unveiled a service allowing users to build custom chatbots called “GPTs” without the need for additional software or coding skills. Notable examples include’s hiking trail recommendation chatbot and Khan Academy’s programming tutorial chatbot. In just two months, three million customized chatbots have been created, underscoring the accessibility and popularity of this service.

Revenue Sharing and Collaboration

One of the most appealing aspects of the ChatGPT App Store is OpenAI’s commitment to revenue sharing. The company has pledged to share revenue with those who offer customized versions of ChatGPT, with the distribution based on the frequency of usage for each chatbot. This creates a collaborative ecosystem, encouraging developers and creators to contribute to the expanding library of custom chatbots.

Conclusion: Shaping the Future of AI

OpenAI App Store stands as a testament to the company’s commitment to innovation, accessibility, and collaboration in the field of artificial intelligence. The platform not only opens new avenues for businesses but also empowers individuals to harness the potential of advanced AI technologies. As the GPT Store continues to evolve, it is poised to become a central hub for the exchange of custom chatbots, marking a pivotal moment in the democratization of artificial intelligence. With the OpenAI App Store, OpenAI is not just offering a service; it’s shaping the future of AI interactions and applications for a diverse and dynamic user base.

Continue Reading


Artificial Intelligence in Education: Transformative Visions and Historical Parallels



Artificial Intelligence in Education Transformative Visions and Historical Parallels

Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) has emerged as a transformative force in various fields, and the realm of education is no exception. Sal Khan, CEO of Khan Academy, envisioned a groundbreaking shift in education with the integration of A.I. chatbots during a TED Talk. His prediction resonated with tech leaders like Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, who foresees the potential of providing every student with a personalized A.I. tutor. This article explores the future of chatbots in tutoring, delving into the promises, challenges, and the broader impact on the education landscape.

The Promise of Personalized Tutoring with A.I.

Sal Khan’s vision revolves around giving every student worldwide access to an artificially intelligent, personalized tutor. The idea is to leverage A.I. chatbots to revolutionize education by providing tailored lessons to individual students. A.I. tutoring bots, such as those introduced by Khan Academy and Duolingo, based on GPT-4, aim to deliver instant, customized instruction, closing achievement gaps more efficiently than traditional teaching methods.

Tech companies and philanthropists have been advocating for the adoption of A.I. in education, supporting initiatives like providing laptops for students and developing video tutorial platforms. The hope is that A.I. chatbots can bridge the gap in educational outcomes by offering relevant, individualized content to students, thereby enhancing learning experiences.

The Rise of Generative A.I. Tools and ChatGPT

The evolution of generative A.I. tools like ChatGPT adds a new dimension to the potential of A.I. in education. Platforms like Khan Academy and Duolingo have integrated A.I. chatbot tutors based on GPT-4, capable of generating human-like responses to user prompts. The use of such advanced language models raises enthusiasm for automated instruction, even as critics voice concerns about the lack of evidence supporting the transformative impact of tutoring bots on education.

Greg Brockman, President of OpenAI, envisions a future where A.I. tutors can establish a connection with individual students, offering guidance and inspiration similar to human teachers. The White House has also recognized the potential, directing efforts to shape A.I.’s role in transforming education and providing resources to support educators deploying A.I.-enabled educational tools.

Challenges and Criticisms Surrounding A.I.-Assisted Instruction

Despite the optimism surrounding A.I.-assisted instruction, education researchers and critics emphasize the need for caution. A.I. chatbots, they argue, may generate inaccurate information and could potentially elevate unreliable sources as authoritative figures in classrooms. Concerns also extend to biases within A.I. systems and their opacity, hindering teachers and students from understanding how chatbots formulate their responses.

Ben Williamson, a chancellor’s fellow at the Centre for Research in Digital Education, warns about potential harmful effects on student learning, stating that the evidence supporting the positive impact of A.I. chatbots is currently lacking. Additionally, there are worries about privacy, intellectual property, and the potential misuse of materials provided by educators and students for business purposes.

Also Read: Hello IDA, Hello Future: Volkswagen AI Voice Assistant Unleashed

Balancing Enthusiasm with Realism: A.I. in Education

While the enthusiasm for A.I. in education is palpable, educators and policymakers must strike a balance. Some argue that the hype over unproven A.I. chatbot tutors could divert attention and resources from more traditional, human-centered interventions proven to increase student graduation rates and college attendance.

Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers, emphasizes the importance of regulation to ensure fairness and safety in the deployment of A.I. tools. Collaboration between educators and policymakers is crucial to harness the potential of A.I. while guarding against potential risks.

Historical Context: Lessons from the Past

To comprehend the current wave of enthusiasm for A.I. in education, it’s valuable to explore historical parallels. In the 1960s, the advent of “teaching machines” fueled high expectations for revolutionizing education. These mechanical and electronic devices were programmed to pose questions on subjects like spelling or math, promising a tailored learning experience.

Capturing the zeitgeist of the time, Popular Mechanics ran an article in October 1961 titled “Will Robots Teach Your Children?” detailing the rise of experimental machine teaching across schools in the United States. These teaching machines, however, turned out to be cumbersome and didactic, creating a short-term sensation that ultimately fell short of the initial hype.

ai in education in 1963

Fast-forward to the present, and we witness a similar narrative with A.I. teaching bots. Despite advancements in technology, it’s crucial to learn from history and approach the integration of A.I. in education with a nuanced perspective. While A.I. chatbots hold the promise of personalized, engaging, and effective learning experiences, the historical context underscores the need for a balanced and realistic assessment of their potential impact.

Also Read: Read this New Year Resolutions App Guide to Unlock Your Best Year

A.I. Chatbots as Study Buddies and Beyond

Enthusiasts envision A.I. tutoring bots as more than just educational tools—they could become study buddies that students consult discreetly. Former Big Tech executives, like Jerome Pesenti and Jared Grusd, have ventured into education, developing A.I. chatbots to assist students in solving math and science problems or organizing and structuring essays.

Sal Khan remains one of the most prominent advocates of tutoring bots, with Khan Academy introducing Khanmigo, an A.I. chatbot designed to help students think through problems rather than completing their schoolwork. Pilot programs are underway in several states to test the efficacy of these chatbot tutors in real educational settings.

Looking Ahead: The Road of Artificial Intelligence in Education

As the educational landscape undergoes transformative changes, the integration of A.I. chatbots in tutoring signifies both potential and challenges. Achieving the right equilibrium between harnessing the advantages of Artificial Intelligence and addressing concerns related to reliability, biases, and privacy is imperative. The collaborative efforts of educators, policymakers, and A.I. developers will determine whether the road to Artificial Intelligence in education leads to a genuine revolution in learning or remains an integral part of the ongoing discourse about the future of education.

Continue Reading


Hello IDA, Hello Future: Volkswagen AI Voice Assistant Unleashed



Hello IDA, Hello Future Volkswagen AI Voice Assistant Unleashed

In a groundbreaking move, Volkswagen has announced its foray into the world of artificial intelligence, unveiling plans to integrate an AI-powered chatbot into all Volkswagen models equipped with its Intelligent Drive Assistant (IDA) voice assistant. This innovative leap was revealed on Monday at CES 2024 in Las Vegas, solidifying Volkswagen’s commitment to redefining the driving experience.

Volkswagen AI Voice Assistant Takes Center Stage

The German automaker is set to roll out this cutting-edge AI-based chatbot, which is built upon software company Cerence’s Chat Pro product, in the second quarter of the year, with the initial launch taking place in Europe. The models earmarked for this transformative technology include Volkswagen’s line of electric vehicles (EVs), such as the ID.7, ID.4, ID.5, and ID.3, along with the new Tiguan, Passat, and Golf vehicles.

While this integration is set to enhance the driving experience for European users, the feature is still under consideration for Volkswagen models in the United States, showcasing the brand’s cautious approach to this revolutionary shift.

Cerence Chat Pro: Powering Conversational AI Integration

At the heart of this technological leap is the integration of Cerence’s Chat Pro into the IDA voice assistant. Much like Mercedes-Benz, which introduced a similar conversational AI-bot to its MBUX infotainment system last June, Volkswagen aims to enrich the in-car experience through ChatGPT’s language generation capabilities.

The IDA voice assistant, already a versatile tool for controlling infotainment, navigation, and air conditioning, as well as answering general knowledge questions, is set to transcend its basic functions. Volkswagen promises a range of capabilities with ChatGPT, including enriching conversations, clearing up queries, interacting in intuitive language, providing vehicle-specific information, and much more—all achieved in a purely hands-free manner.

How ChatGPT Integration Works

Once the feature is launched, drivers will seamlessly interact with the IDA voice assistant using the familiar “Hello IDA” wake word or by pressing the button on the steering wheel. If the voice assistant encounters a request beyond its current capabilities, it will anonymously forward the query to the AI. The response will then be delivered through the IDA voice assistant, ensuring a seamless user experience where drivers may not even be aware of when ChatGPT is actively in use.

This marks a significant step forward in making AI an integral part of the driving experience, with ChatGPT acting as an additional layer of intelligence to handle more complex requests and interactions.

Also Read: Read this New Year Resolutions App Guide to Unlock Your Best Year

Future Prospects: A New Era of In-Car Assistants

Volkswagen sees the integration of ChatGPT as just the beginning of a larger collaboration with Cerence. Stefan Ortmanns, CEO of Cerence, hinted at exploring further collaboration to design a new, large language model (LLM)-based user experience. This collaboration aims to lay the groundwork for Volkswagen’s next-generation in-car assistant, promising even more advanced features and capabilities.

It’s worth noting that this particular rollout is distinct from the efforts of Cariad, the software arm of Volkswagen’s parent company, VW Group. Established in 2020 to address VW’s software challenges, Cariad is on a separate trajectory, with its focus on overcoming software-related obstacles and enhancing the overall digital experience for Volkswagen users.

Conclusion: Redefining the Driving Experience

In conclusion, Volkswagen’s integration of the ChatGPT-based AI chatbot into its vehicles represents a significant step forward in the automotive industry. By leveraging cutting-edge technology like Cerence’s Chat Pro, the German automaker is poised to enhance the in-car experience for European users, with the potential for a broader global rollout in the future.

“Volkswagen AI voice assistant,” “AI-powered chatbot,” and “conversational AI integration” underscore the central theme of this transformative shift. As automotive technology continues to evolve, Volkswagen’s commitment to embracing AI not only demonstrates its dedication to innovation but also sets the stage for a new era of intelligent, interactive, and hands-free driving experiences. With the promise of future collaborations and advancements, the integration of ChatGPT marks the beginning of an exciting chapter in the intersection of artificial intelligence and automotive technology.

Continue Reading