Business

Brazilian President: The World Doesn’t Have to Endure Elon Musk’s ‘Far Right’ Views Just Because of His Wealth

Published

on

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has asserted that the world is not obligated to tolerate billionaire Elon Musk’s “far-right anything goes” agenda simply because of his vast wealth. Lula da Silva made this statement in an interview in Brazil, published on Monday, shortly after Musk’s social media platform X was suspended in Brazil, affecting a significant market.

 

“The Brazilian justice system may have sent a crucial message that the world is not required to endure Musk’s extreme right-wing views just because he is wealthy,” the president remarked.

 

These comments are part of an ongoing dispute between Lula da Silva and Musk concerning free speech, far-right content, and misinformation within Brazil. Over the weekend, many Brazilians, including the president, bid farewell to X, sharing their profiles on other social media platforms.

 

Brazil represents a vital market for X, which has faced challenges with advertiser loss since Musk’s acquisition and rebranding of Twitter last year. Approximately 40 million Brazilians, or about one-fifth of the population, use X at least once a month, according to Emarketer.

 

The platform’s access was blocked following a Supreme Court order due to Musk’s refusal to appoint a legal representative in Brazil. The court had previously mandated the suspension of several X accounts as part of a broad investigation into misinformation and hate speech that threatens Brazilian democracy.

 

These suspensions have included accounts linked to former President Jair Bolsonaro’s right-wing party and individuals accused of undermining democracy. Musk, a self-declared “free speech absolutist,” has criticized the court’s actions as censorship, a viewpoint supported by Brazil’s political right.

 

On Tuesday, Musk further engaged with Brazilian politics by sharing a link on X to an upcoming demonstration advocating for “freedom, protesting judicial overreach, and defending free speech.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version